Skip to main content

Table 11 Naïve and Multinomial Naïve Bayes classifiers’ results t

From: "Our Little Secret": pinpointing potential predators

 

Filter

Stopwords filter

Attributes selection

TP

FP

FN

Pre.

Recall

F1

Naïve Bayes, Unigram

1.

No Filter

No

No – 703

137

4909

5

0.3

0.96

0.05

2.

No Filter

No

Yes – 569

137

5773

5

0.2

0.97

0.05

3.

No Filter

Yes

No – 764

136

5218

6

0.03

0.96

0.05

4.

No Filter

Yes

Yes – 572

136

6270

6

0.02

0.96

0.04

5.

Computer

No

No – 654

137

5992

5

0.02

0.96

0.04

6.

Computer

No

Yes – 576

137

6127

5

0.02

0.97

0.04

7.

Computer

Yes

No – 654

136

6537

6

0.02

0.96

0.04

8.

Computer

Yes

Yes – 586

136

6710

6

0.02

0.96

0.04

Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Unigram

9.

No Filter

No

No – 703

138

1465

4

0.09

0.97

0.16

10.

No Filter

No

Yes – 569

137

911

5

0.13

0.96

0.23

11.

No Filter

Yes

No – 764

139

2161

3

0.06

0.98

0.11

12.

No Filter

Yes

Yes – 572

138

1166

4

0.11

0.97

0.19

13.

Computer

No

No – 654

137

713

5

0.16

0.96

0.28

14.

Computer

No

Yes – 576

137

623

5

0.18

0.96

0.30

15.

Computer

Yes

No – 654

138

952

4

0.13

0.97

0.22

16.

Computer

Yes

Yes – 586

137

831

5

0.14

0.96

0.25

Naïve Bayes Applied to Accept file (improved) Approach

17.

Computer

NA

No – 136

91

76

51

0.54

0.64

0.59

18.

Computer

NA

Yes – 103

91

76

51

0.54

0.64

0.59

Multinomial Naïve Bayes Applied to Accept file (improved) Approach

19.

Computer

NA

No – 136

13

3

129

0.81

0.09

0.16

20.

Computer

NA

Yes – 103

11

4

131

0.73

0.08

0.14